data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1295/a1295f5df505ab813ba371c940fdedb61c09c60f" alt="Wikipedia truecrypt"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8f43/c8f43650bf4d6944c0e4bb727614d360c1f344d3" alt="wikipedia truecrypt wikipedia truecrypt"
#Wikipedia truecrypt code
"Redis has a license to kill: Open-source database maker takes some code proprietary". ^ "The Open Source Definition | Open Source Initiative".
#Wikipedia truecrypt software
^ "DoD Open Source Software (OSS) FAQ".īeeGFS source code is publicly available from their website, and because of this they claiming BeeGFS as "Open-Source" software it is in fact not because this license prohibits distributing modified versions of the software, or using certain features of the software without authorization. BeeGFS End User License Agreement EditīeeGFS EULA is the license of the distributed parallel file system BeeGFS, except the client for Linux, which is licensed under GPLv2. The Open Source Initiative rejects the TrueCrypt License, as "it has elements incompatible with the OSD." The Free Software Foundation criticizes the license for restricting who can execute the program, and for enforcing a trademark condition. When TrueCrypt was discontinued, the VeraCrypt fork switched to the Apache License, but retained the TrueCrypt License for code inherited from TrueCrypt. The TrueCrypt License was used by the TrueCrypt disk encryption utility. The dual release of the closed-source Enterprise Edition and the open-source Community Edition makes GitLab an open core company.įurther information: TrueCrypt § License and source model openly discloses that the EE License makes their Enterprise Edition product "proprietary, closed source code." However, the company makes the source code of the Community Edition public, as well as the repository's issue tracker, and allows users to modify the source code. GitLab also releases a Community Edition under the MIT License. The GitLab Enterprise Edition License is used exclusively by GitLab's commercial offering. GitLab Enterprise Edition License (EE License) Edit In September 2018, Matthew Garrett criticized Commons Clause calling it an "older way of doing things" and said it "doesn't help the commons". On August 22, 2018, Redis Labs shifted some Redis Modules from the Affero General Public License to a combination of the Apache License 2.0 and the Commons Clause. Under the combined license, the software is source-available, but not open-source.
#Wikipedia truecrypt software license
The Commons Clause, created by Fossa, Inc., is an addendum to an open-source software license that restricts users from selling the software. The following source-available software licenses are considered non-free licenses because they have limitations that prevent them from being open-source according to the Open Source Initiative and free to the Free Software Foundation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1295/a1295f5df505ab813ba371c940fdedb61c09c60f" alt="Wikipedia truecrypt"